Film Assignment Essay

For this assignment, I chose the 1996 movie A Time to Kill is applying Carl Rogers Model of Argument. The photograph is based on the new(a) of the same title by John Grisham that tells the fib of finding justice amidst the racial bigotry of the South. It is the story about a black man, Carl Lee Hailey, who killed the men who raped and mauled his 10-year old daughter Tonya and is looking at a death sentence should he be found blamable of murder in flirt in a town where racial prejudice continues to abound.It is through the efforts of his defense lawyer, Jake Brigance that Carl Lee was acquitted and released (McConnnaghuey and capital of Mississippi 1996). At first glance, a debate is very likely to ensue. Some would say Carl Lee is guilty because he broke the law by murdering the suspects. The latter had been arrested and should have been given their day in approach and let the law take its course. They believe that revenge was Carl Lees motive for taking matters in his own han ds and that the death penalty is appropriate because of what he did, consistent to the adage, the punishment must primed(p) the crime. Legally, Carl Lee is indeed guilty and the jury appears to be leaning towards that decision. However, looking at it from the other side, on that point are others, as personified by Jake, who believe Carl Lee did the right thing though it was very drastic. plot of land it may be true that Carl Lee was legally guilty, this does non immediately mean he is chastely wrong. In the latter part of the film, Jake won the case because he was able to find common ground, not only with the jury, but also to the audience.He took their attention away from Carl Lee and his act and instead concentrate it somewhere else on the actual victim Tonya. Jake did this by taking everyone on a journey deep down Carl Lees mind, putting themselves in his place, retracing his road to perdition on the day his daughter came to him knock about and bleeding to the time he ki lled the suspects. He closed the journey by telling the jury to presently imagine she were white. This is the common ground Jake successfully establi drop down. The secret behind it was Jake is able to make the jury shed off any racial bias they may have by getting them to empathize with Carl Lee. The answer was instead of looking at a black man seeking redress for the attack on his daughter, but just a father who is merely looking out for his daughter. It can be inferred that everyone on the jury would have done the same thing if the victim had been their own child.They also know how aslant the justice system is in town and that black people never get a fairly trial but in this case, Jake succeeded in making them see it from a different perspective. It is certain that everyone knows justice is not always found in the courtroom, especially in this town and there are clock when doing the right thing means breaking the law because the law is not perfect as it is administered by a racially prejudiced society. What was substituted here is a deeper sense of justice that is common to all, rooted in religious beliefs.In other words, people like Carl Lee are guided by their in the flesh(predicate) morals that are very fundamental where it becomes easy to discern right from wrong. All in all, the film shows a demonstration on how the Rogerian Model is applied as common ground was established with the audience by the performers in the film through the use of empathy to establish this common ground. Bibliography A Time to Kill. say by Joel Schumacher. Performed by Matthew McConnnaghuey and Samuel L. Jackson. 1996.